Legal Opinion

United States v. Rainey

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided August 8, 1950No. 17792PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, Chief Judge.

The defendant has filed one motion to dismiss the indictment, another for a bill of particulars, and a third “For Bill of Discovery and Inspection.” These several motions have been examined and will be considered in their order.

1. The indictment conforms to Rule 7, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U. S.C.A. It is provided by paragraph (c) of said Rule 7 that: “The indictment * * * shall be a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.” The indictment in this case charges the defendant with violating Section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. United States v. MangiaracinaDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. United States v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
  3. United States v. HaasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  4. United States v. TrownsellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953
  5. United States v. BrodsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API