Garrow v. Pennsylvania General Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
This is a proceeding for a declaratory judgment that defendant insurance company’s policy of automobile liability insurance provides plaintiff with hospital, medical, and disability benefits (known in the trade as PIP coverage). The trial court ruled that defendant’s policy provided no such coverage for plaintiff. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the policy did provide coverage. 40 Or App 23, 594 P2d 415 (1979). This court granted review.
Plaintiff is the son of Paul Garrow, who is the named insured under defendant’s policy. The issue is whether the provisions of ORS 743.800 provide…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Allen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Waller v. Rocky Mountain Fire and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Schehen v. North-West Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Garrow v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gattman v. FavroOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Cambron v. North-West InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Farmers Insurance Company v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. RohdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.