Legal Opinion

Finestone v. Florida Power & Light Co.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 19, 2004No. 03-14040-CIVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

COHN, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant, Florida Power & Light Company’s (“FP & L”), Motion for Determination of Duty Owed (DE 54), Plaintiffs’ Response (DE 60), FP & L’s Reply (DE 75), and FP & L’s Request for Oral Argument (DE 70). The Court has considered the submissions of the parties and the record.

I. Background

This action arises from operations at FP & L’s Hutchinson Island Nuclear Plant (“Plant”), which operates as a generator of electricity from the use of nuclear power. (Compl. at ¶ 10). Plaintiffs claim that Zachary Finestone, contracted cancer as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Florida Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re Tmi. General Public Utilities Corp. Metropolitan Edison Company Jersey Central Power & Light Co. Pennsylvania Electric Co. Babcock & Wilcox Company McDermott Incorporated Ue & C Catalytic, Inc. (Raytheon) Burns & Roe Enterprises Dresser IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Whiting v. Boston Edison Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  4. O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1990
  5. Corcoran v. New York Power AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API