Legal Opinion
O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided September 26, 1990No. 88-1272PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
Before the Court are a Motion by the Defendants for a Determination of the legal duty owed to the Plaintiff (# 73) and a Motion by the Plaintiff to certify an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (# 95). The Court grants the Motion to Determine the Defendants’ legal duty (# 73) and grants in part and denies in part the Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify an interlocutory appeal (# 95).
BACKGROUND
This is a “public liability action” under the Price-Anderson Act 1 filed by a radiation worker against an Illinois public utility and its contractor. 2 In this case, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Barnes v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Davis v. Marathon Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Dezort v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Von Bulow by Auersperg v. Von BulowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Brannon v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- In Re Tmi. General Public Utilities Corp. Metropolitan Edison Company Jersey Central Power & Light Co. Pennsylvania Electric Co. Babcock & Wilcox Company McDermott Incorporated Ue & C Catalytic, Inc. (Raytheon) Burns & Roe Enterprises Dresser IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Day v. NLODistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- Whiting v. Boston Edison Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.