Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. King

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 1, 1979No. ACM 22412PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ORSER, Judge:

Tried by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial, the accused was convicted, consonant with his pleas, of four specifications of transferring marihuana, one specification of transferring cocaine, one specification of using marihuana1 and one specification of transferring tablets containing amphetamine.2 The approved sentence is a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for twelve months, forfeiture of $260.00 per month for twelve months and reduction to airman basic.

In the first assertion of error we consider, appellate defense counsel contend…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. EttlesonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. MobleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. BazanU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. CohenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. NicholsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API