Legal Opinion

Genardini v. Kline

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1918No. Civil No. 1585PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Cochise. Alfred C. Lockwood, Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS BY THE COURT.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Cochise. Alfred C. Lockwood, Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS BY THE COURT. Action commenced by tbe appellee against appellant Genardini as the lessor of plaintiff and against the other named defendants as tenants of said lessor, in actual possession, to recover the possession of certain described buildings situate on lots numbered 21 and 22 in block No. 82 of tbe Douglas townsite, in Cochise county, alleged to have been granted by Genardini to plaintiff by written lease made and bearing date tbe twenty-eighth day of September, 1915,…

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

(After Stating the Facts as Above).— The manifest purpose of this action is the recovery of the possession of the property described in the complaint to the plaintiff. The estate claimed and sought to be recovered is a term of years beginning November 1, 1915, and ending October 31, 1919. The title set forth by the plaintiff is a lease •dated September 28, 1915, made by appellant Genardini to plaintiff, duly acknowledged and recorded. The rent reserved by the terms of the lease is the sum of $1,680 per annum, payable monthly at the rate of $110 per month in advance on the first of each month.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Temple Enterprises, Inc. v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bauer v. BauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Tolmachoff v. EshbaughArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Duckworth v. MichelWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Genardini v. KlineArizona Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API