Legal Opinion

Foster v. Beaty

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 15, 1821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was an application for a writ of certiorari, to qüash a record of the Circuit Court of Common Pleas in a prosecutioii there, wherein the petitioner had been adjudged the putative father of a bastard child.

Read the full summary

This was an application for a writ of certiorari, to qüash a record of the Circuit Court of Common Pleas in a prosecutioii there, wherein the petitioner had been adjudged the putative father of a bastard child. The respondent, it appeared, had made complaint to a Justice of the Peace, charging the petitioner as the father of a bastard child of which she was then pregnant; whereupon he was apprehended by virtue of a warrant issued by the Justice, and gave bond for his appearance at the Circuit Court of Common Pleas in which Court a trial was afterwards had by jury. But no accusation or…

1Opinion of the Court

Mellen C. J.

In all indictments such facts must be stated as, if proved, will justify a conviction and sentence. In civil actions too, the declaration must state a good cause of action, and there must be an averment of all those facts which it is necessary should be proved to entitle the plaintiff to a verdict. In looking into the record produced to support this application, it appears to be grossly defective. Some of the most important facts necessary to justify a verdict against the original defendant are totally omitted. No declaration was ever filed in the cause; no plea given ; of course…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glidden v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  2. State v. HackettSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API