Glidden v. Bath Iron Works Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.
This case presents defendant’s exceptions to the overruling of a special demurrer which, after the amendment of the several counts to eliminate allegations of damage which are not proper elements thereof, challenges the sufficiency of the declaration for its failure to allege either a legal duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff or the violation thereof, or facts from which such duty, or violation, might be inferred. The alternative form of alleging the omissions satisfies the principle recognized in Chickering v. Lincoln County Power Co., 118 Me. 414; 108 A. 460; recently affirmed in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Minor v. SharonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Seattle Can Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Chickering v. Lincoln County Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rubin v. JosephsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Bartley v. CoutureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
- Camarda v. Summit HomesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Davis v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Estate of Picard v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.