Legal Opinion

Auernheimer v. Gardner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1934No. 24871. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb, J. —

The facts are undisputed in this case, and the only question to be decided is whether or not the community of appellants is liable to respondents as well as the individual members, separately.

The appeal is from a decree of foreclosure of a real estate mortgage in favor of respondents against both appellants and the community.

On January 18, 1929, appellants, who were then, and at all times since have been, husband and wife, secured from Osner & Mehlhorn, a corporation, a mortgage loan of thirty-five hundred dollars, in consideration for which they executed and delivered to Osner &…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Katz v. JuddWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Spokane State Bank v. TiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Peterson v. ZimmermanWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bergman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  3. Oil Heat Co. of Port Angeles, Inc. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Dizard & Getty v. DamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Beyers v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API