Legal Opinion

Antol v. Exposto

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 20, 1996No. 95-3714UnknownCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

In this suit brought under the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law, plaintiffs assert claims against individual corporate officers and shareholders for wages due from the corporate employer. Because the claims are based on a collective bargaining agreement, we hold that the Wage Collection Law is preempted by the Labor Management Relations Act and the National Labor Relations Act. Accordingly, we affirm the district court orders granting summary judgment and dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiffs are 111 employees of the Shan-nopin Coal Company…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Antol v. EspostoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Lozano Rodriguez v. JaddouDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API