Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Peck

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 16, 1990No. 89-1601PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This petition for writ of mandamus arises from an alleged error on the part of the trial court in reducing a contingent attorney fee set by a contract between a minor's parent and the minor's attorneys.

Bridgett McMurtrey, a minor, and Jacqueline McMurtrey, her mother, were injured in an automobile accident in Lauderdale County. Bridgett's father — Jacqueline's husband — employed Harold G. Peck and John O. Morrow, Jr., doing business as Peck and Morrow, Attorneys at Law, to represent his wife and daughter in their claims arising out of the automobile accident. He signed a one-third contingent…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Van Schaack v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Faulk & Co. v. Hobbie Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. King v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Cobbs v. NorvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kiker v. PROBATE COURT OF MOBILE COUNTYSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Madison County Department of Human Resources v. T.S. Ex Rel. F.M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Madison County Department of Human Resources v. T.S. Ex Rel. F.M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API