Legal Opinion

Void v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 4, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-2768Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRUCE E. VOID, Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:17-cv-02768 (TNM) UNITED STATES, Respondent. U MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s pro se “Motion of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(1)(A) and (d)(2), and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2), and Title

28 U.S.C. §§1333(a), 1631, and 1652,” which is construed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, the petition is denied and this civil action is dismissed. “[M]ore than two decades…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swain v. PressleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security FacilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  3. Williams v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Lester D. Milhouse v. Edward H. Levi, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Banks v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API