Carl T. Wilson v. State of Indiana

May, Judge.

[1] Carl T. Wilson brings an interlocutory appeal of the pretrial denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Wilson argues the evidence should have been suppressed because the search occurred after police officers arrested him without probable cause. We reverse.

Facts and Procedural History

[2] On September 6, 2016, a resident of a duplex made a 911 call complaining of a car parked in the yard on the unoccupied side of the duplex. She indicated the car may be gray and she did not recognize it. Her son had approached the car, but the occupants did not respond when he knocked on the…