Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Antar
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 27, 2000No. Civil Action 93-3988PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ACKERMAN, District Judge.
In an opinion issued on July 15, 1998, this court found that the defendants Sam M. Antar, Allen Antar, and Benjamin Kuszer engaged in an extensive, multifaceted fraud which consisted of cash skimming, falsification of inventory counts, and the inflation of sales figures of certain key stores for the purpose of artificially inflating the price of Crazy Eddie stock. See SEC v. Antar, 15 F.Supp.2d 477 (D.N.J.1998) (the “Liability Opinion”). This court further found that the defendants, having artificially and fraudulently inflated the price of the stock, then sold…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In the Matter of Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz Off the Coast of France on March 16, 1978Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. AntarDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. PatakiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- County of Essex v. First Union BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. DUBOVOYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. FierroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.