Legal Opinion

Audatex North America Inc. v. Mitchell International Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 12, 2014No. Case No. 13-CV-1523-BEN (BLM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY

ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge.

Before this Court is a Motion to Stay, filed by Defendant Mitchell International, Inc. (Docket No. 64). Defendant asks this Court to stay this matter pending the resolution of three Covered Business Method (CBM) petitions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature with leave to re-file the motion if a CBM review is instituted.

BACKGROUND

I. Litigation

On February 6, 2012, Plaintiff Audatex North America, Inc. commenced this action by filing an action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. Market-Alerts Pty. Ltd. v. Bloomberg Finance L.P.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Protegrity Corp. v. Epicor Software Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  2. Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  3. Golden Eye Media USA, Inc. v. Trolley Bags UK LtdDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  4. No Spill, LLC. v. Scepter CorporationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  5. Unisone Strategic IP, Inc. v. Life Technologies CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API