Legal Opinion

Universal Checks & Forms, Inc. v. Pencor, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 11, 2013No. 5D12-3593Published

1Opinion of the CourtEvander, J.

Universal Checks & Forms, Inc., Universal Print Management, Inc., and Brian Thornton (collectively “Universal”) appeal a final judgment dismissing their complaint against Pencor, Inc., and William Shurm (collectively “Pencor”). The trial court dismissed the complaint on the basis that Universal’s claims were preempted by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Because they only peripherally involve ERISA, Universal’s claims are not preempted and, accordingly, we reverse.1

Universal filed a complaint for breach of fiduciary duty and negligence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company Virgil E. Arrington v. James A. NeusserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API