Legal Opinion

Parker v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 5, 2014No. 38, 2013PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice:

Defendant-below/Appellant, Tiffany Parker, appeals from a Superior Court jury conviction of Assault Second Degree. Parker claims that the Superior Court erred in admitting statements posted on her Fa-*683cebook profile. The Superior Court admitted the evidence under Rule 901 of the Delaware Rules of Evidence. Parker argues that we should adopt the rule set forth in Griffin v. State, a Maryland Court of Appeals decision, to authenticate social media evidence. Under the Maryland approach, social media evidence may only be authenticated through the testimony of the creator,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tienda, Ronnie Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Lorraine v. Markel American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  3. Lilly v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Tony BrowneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Taylor Dwayne Dering v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
  3. Sublet, Harris & Monge-Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. State of New Jersey v. Terri HannahNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  5. Kinda v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API