Legal Opinion
People v. Abner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to challenge the requirement that he register as a sex offender. We reject that contention. At the time of defendant’s SORA hearing, any challenge to the registration require*1629ment in the context of a SORA proceeding was foreclosed by our decision in People v Carabello (309 AD2d 1227, 1228 [2003]), where we held, consistent with the other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CampanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. LidenNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. SchrockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CarabelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. ReitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. MaxwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015