Legal Opinion

People v. Reitano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 2009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The only proper procedural vehicle for challenging a determination that an out-of-state conviction subjects an offender to the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C) is a CPLR article 78 proceeding against the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (see People v Teagle, 64 AD3d 549, 550 [2009]; People v Rendace, 58 AD3d 821 [2009]; People v Geier, 56 AD3d 539, 540 [2008]; People v Carabello, 309 AD2d 1227, 1228 [2003]; Matter of Mandel, 293 AD2d 750, 751 [2002]). Thus, on this appeal from the Supreme Court’s order designating the appellant a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. North v. Board of ExaminersNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. TeagleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. People v. CarabelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re MandelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. AbnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Kasckarow v. Board of Examiners of Sex OffendersNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  4. ABNER, JESSE, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. FLEMING, JASON, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API