Legal Opinion
Gray v. Lacke
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 25, 1988No. 88-C-329-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHABAZ, District Judge.
On April 18, 1988, the plaintiff Cheryll Gray filed her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendants Jerome Lacke, Stanley Klein, David Niemann and Diane Kohn alleging they violated her First and Four teenth Amendment rights while she was employed by the Dane County Sheriffs Department.
On September 2, 1988, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss based on the following grounds: 1) the action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata; 2) the action is barred by the doctrine of collateral es-toppel; 3) certain claims are barred by the statute of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gray v. LackeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Handley v. PhillipsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Adams v. McAllisterDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Envirotech Sanitary Systems, Inc. v. ShoenerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- 50 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1575, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,360 Cheryll Gray, F/k/a Cheryll Lengyel v. Jerome Lacke, Stanley Klein, David Niemann, and Diane KohnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989