Legal Opinion
Handley v. Phillips
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 9, 1989No. Civ. 87-1176PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONABOY, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Plaintiffs have filed a brief in opposition to which the Defendants have replied. Local Rule 401 et seq. This court has taken into consideration the arguments presented by counsel in this matter and, for the following reasons, shall grant in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and proceed to trial on the remaining allegations.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Kathleen Handley began her employment with Luzerne County on or about July…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Christensen v. Grant County Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Drinkwater v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Hitchens v. County of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Danese v. KnoxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.