Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Harrison, McCready & Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 28, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petitions foe Reheaeings.

Beown, J.

Both parties have filed petitions for rehearing.

Plaintiffs in error complain of that portion of the opinion and judgment heretofore rendered herein, reversing and remanding the judgment of the court below, wherein this court directed the trial court to allow the defendant to move for a new trial if it be so advised. It is true that the trial court, in its order granting the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, also in the same order denied the defendant’s motion for a new trial. This fact was not overlooked by this court, as its opinion will show.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martin v. MichellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. In Re Levy's EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Sherman v. LynchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Heuacker v. FarrellySupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Goodstein v. LevyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API