Jenkin Contracting Co. v. Sixth Avenue & 57th Street Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
While the “consent” of the owner, which is the predicate of a lien in favor of a contractor under section 3 of the Lien Law, need not amount to a contractual relationship, we think that the trial court properly decided on the facts of this ease and that the owner had not given his “ consent ” within the requirement of the statute. Judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Peek,
P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Breitel, JJ. [See post, p. 760.]
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hartman v. TravisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Forte v. Roc Hill Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Seaboard Pools, Inc. v. FreemanNew York Supreme Court · 1965