Legal Opinion

Forte v. Roc Hill Associates, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1965Published

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

The trial of this action dealt with two causes of action, one to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and the other to recover money based upon a theory of unjust enrichment. The amount involved has been stipulated to be $30,000. The trial itself concentrated on the disputed existence of liability as against the contesting defendants. Other named defendants had previously defaulted. Actually involved here were two individuals (fee owners of the subject property), a partnership, and the receiver of the partnership. Forte, the plaintiff, agreed to perform certain contracting work at property known as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. National Wall Paper Co. v. . SireNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. De Klyn v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Husted v. . MathesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. P. Delany & Co. v. DuvouNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API