Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barocio v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 2005No. PD-1980-03Published

1Concurrence

PRICE, J.,

filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which JOHNSON and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.

I agree with the majority that the trial court did not err denying the appellant’s motion to suppress. I write separately to explain my reasons.

The appellant filed a motion to suppress statements and tangible evidence obtained by a warrant that he claims was obtained in violation of the United States and Texas Constitutions. Specifically, the appellant claimed that sheriffs deputies entered his home without a warrant and then applied for a warrant based on information obtained while they were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. State v. SteelmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. McNairy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Barocio v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API