Doyle Dickerson Co. v. Durden
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
This is an unusual action seeking damages for the conversion of funds. Plaintiff Doyle Dickerson Company was a subcontractor on a construction project and in that capacity provided labor and materials to the M. E. Durden Construction Company, Inc. (hereafter “Durden, Inc.”). While Durden, Inc. was paid in full for the labor and materials provided on the project, it did not pay plaintiff but expended the funds it had received to pay for other expenses. Plaintiff did not exercise its lien rights and they expired.
The complaint maintains that the funds received by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rolleston v. HuiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Short & Paulk Supply Co. v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. TidwellDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1986
- CHARTER MORTGAGE COMPANY v. AhouseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anthony v. American General Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Conner v. TateDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- Key v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Jastram v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Pioneer Construction, Inc. v. May (In re May)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.