Legal Opinion

Young v. Sherwin-Williams Co., Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1990No. 88-1324PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERREN, Associate Judge:

Appellant Richard Young, a firefighter, was seriously injured while saving the life of appellee Brownie Sprouse by attempting to catch Sprouse as he fell fifty feet from a bridge. Young appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment for all appellees in Young’s personal injury action. Young’s arguments concern the “professional rescuer doctrine” this court adopted in Gillespie v. Washington, 395 A.2d 18 (D.C.1978). He contends, first, that because his rescue attempt was outside the scope of his normal duties, the professional rescuer doctrine should not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Maltman v. SauerWashington Supreme Court · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Nickens v. Labor Agency of Metropolitan WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Weishapl v. SowersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Anicet v. GantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Hopkins v. MedeirosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Pinter v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API