Legal Opinion
Continental Insurance v. Bahnan
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 26, 2000No. 99-1579PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Continental Insurance Company issued a Business Owners Xtra (BOX) policy to Anthony Bahnan. The policy covered a three-family house situated at 17 Mott St.,' Worcester, Massachusetts. A fire occurred a. few months after coverage had attached, and.Bahnan made a claim. In the course of the ensuing investigation, Continental came to suspect that Bahnan had misrepresented the condition of the premises. From that point forward,- the parties’ relationship became adversarial.
For purposes of this appeal, we need not recount the ebb and flow of subsequent events, save only to note…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wilma Cumpiano A/K/A Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez v. Banco Santander Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc., Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Pharm. Industry Average Wholesale Price Lit.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- In Re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Federal Insurance Co v. HPSC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- In Re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.