Cantrell v. Fowler
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before COTHRAN, J., Spartanburg, March, 1885. This was an action by I. H. Cantrell against William Fowler and S. T. McCravy, for the recovery of a lot of land, commenced September 15, 1888. The opinion sufficiently states the case. upon the first points considered by this court, cited Code, § 88, ¶ 8 ; Qhev., 6; Ten. (N. J.), 106; 3 Id., 621; 13 Wend., 85; 29 Barb., 524; 2 Wait Prac., 373, 563; 3 Ibid., 563; Freem.
Read the full summary
Before COTHRAN, J., Spartanburg, March, 1885. This was an action by I. H. Cantrell against William Fowler and S. T. McCravy, for the recovery of a lot of land, commenced September 15, 1888. The opinion sufficiently states the case. upon the first points considered by this court, cited Code, § 88, ¶ 8 ; Qhev., 6; Ten. (N. J.), 106; 3 Id., 621; 13 Wend., 85; 29 Barb., 524; 2 Wait Prac., 373, 563; 3 Ibid., 563; Freem. Judg., 160, 338; 20 8. 0., 460; 21 Id., 26; 2 Gold., 298; 33 Cal, 322; 14 8. C., 166. IJpon the question of the lien of the judgment upon lands exempt from levy and sale, counsel…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice McIver.
This was an action to recover possession of a house and lot in the city of Spartanburg, both parties claiming from a common source of title, W. B. Ravan — the plaintiff, claiming under a deed from said Ravan bearing date November 30, 1882, and the defendants claiming as purchasers at sheriff’s sale under an alleged judgment and execution against said Ravan. There was evidence introduced to the effect that the property in question was exempt under the homestead laws of this State from levy and sale under execution, the same being the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Ex Parte MileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905