Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 19, 2007No. 1D06-3813PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no preserved reversible error apparent from the face of the record. However, we note that the trial court orally pronounced that the sentence imposed in this case was to run concurrently to any other sentence he was *703then serving, but the concurrent area was not checked off on the written judgment and sentence. Although the written sentence contains a scrivener’s error, this Court cannot direct the trial court to correct the error because the issue was not preserved for appeal by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Proctor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Aument v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheena Latson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Juan I. Barriera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Sheena Latson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API