Legal Opinion

Bassett v. Haren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1895No. Nos. 9283—(92)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe district court for Big Stone county, O. L. Brown, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

•CANTY, J.

This action was commenced as an action of replevin for the recovery of tbe possession of 1,164 bushels of wheat, and, if tbe action bad continued through tbe trial to be simply an action of replevin, tbe verdict for tbe plaintiff could not be sustained. It conclusively appears from tbe evidence that, when tbe action was commenced, tbe defendant bad a lien on tbe wheat for tbe payment of tbe sum of $327 due him from tbe plaintiff on one claim, and tbe sum of $50 due him from tbe plaintiff on another claim, and that, while tbe first claim has since been satisfied, tbe second has notr…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adamson v. WigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Lyons v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Hommerberg v. State Bank of SlaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Bradley v. Bradley Estate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Cumbey v. LovettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API