Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 18, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

The pertinent facts are that in February, 1907, the plaintiff delivered to one George E. Williams two notes, each for $500, blank as to the payee, a policy of insurance upon his life and an assignment thereof blank as to the assignee, for the purpose of securing a loan of $1,000 which Williams made to him. Williams by forgery raised one note to $1,500 and delivered it together with the other note, the policy of insurance and the assignment, to the defendant Stanley, from whom he obtained $2,000. Later, in April, 1910, Williams paid Stanley $2,000, thereby terminating the latter’s right to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Maxwell v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  3. Talty v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Herman v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Draper v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Union Old Lowell National Bank v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Marcotte v. Massachusetts Security Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Lewis v. BlumeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Perry v. Manufacturers National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Thompson v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API