Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Dissent
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. I would hold Code § 65.2-708(0 provides only one extension of the statute of limitations contained in Code § 65.2-708(A). Since the time provided by the statute of limitations, even with the extension contained in subsection (C), expired before Gordon filed his claim, I would hold Gordon’s claim time-barred.
In relevant part, Code § 65.2-708 states:
*627A. Upon its own motion or upon the application of any party in interest, on the ground of a change in condition, the Commission may review any award and on such review may make an award ending, diminishing or…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Califano v. JobstSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Earley v. LandsidleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Burns v. Board of Sup'rs of Stafford CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Town of Crewe v. MarlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.