Legal Opinion
State v. Stip
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1976No. 11815PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNN, Chief Justice.
The defendant was convicted in a jury trial by the Fourth Judicial Circuit Court of obstructing a public officer under SDCL 3-15-3 1 in the discharge of her duty in that defendant prevented the Lake County Director of Equalization from making a property spot check pursuant to SDCL 10-3-23 2 on his farm. Defendant appeals, alleging as error (1) that the director of equalization was introduced as the county assessor, and that county assessors have no power to make such spot checks, (2) that the director had an alternate method of assessment, and thus there was no obstruction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JorgensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- In re C.E.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Matter of CESouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. FreySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. FreySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989