In re C.E.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.
These two appeals are from the adjudicatory and the dispositional hearings in which C.E. and D.E. were adjudged to be neglected and dependent children and appellant’s parental rights were terminated. We affirm.
On the evening of October 13, 1977, a report was made to the Mitchell Police Department concerning a disturbance at appellant’s apartment. This was apparently not an unusual occurrence. The police officers contacted the Department of Social Services (Department) because they believed something had to be done with the *555children. Ms. Diane Cogley, a Department social…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re N. J. W.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Forslund v. Hennepin County Welfare DepartmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. StipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Welfare of ScalzoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Good v. Dauphin County Social Services For Children And YouthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Good v. Dauphin County Social Services for Children & YouthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Matter of CESouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979