Legal Opinion

Hoffrichter v. Brookhaven Country Club Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1969No. 17320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

The appellant Wally Hoffrichter sued Brookhaven Country Club and two other corporations alleged to be its alter ego, for damages for breach of an alleged employment contract. When appellant rested his case, and before any evidence was offered on behalf of appellees, the court sustained appellees’ motion for a directed verdict and rendered judgment that appellant take nothing.

In determining the question of whether there was sufficient evidence to raise issues of fact upon which the jury could have rendered a verdict in appellant’s favor we must view the evidence in the light…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Ford v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Dallas Hotel Co. v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Stuckey v. Union Mortgage & Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ed Rachal Foundation v. D'UNGER, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  2. Dobson v. Metro Label Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  3. Lone Star Steel Co. v. WahlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Ward v. Consolidated Foods CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. the Ed Rachal Foundation and Paul D. Altheide, Individually v. Claude v. D'Unger, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API