Legal Opinion

Washington Natl. Insurance Co. v. Hines

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1935No. 14,957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridwell, J.

Appellee brought this action on an insurance policy issued by appellant to him, seeking to recover for loss of time occasioned by sickness in accordance with the provisions of said policy.

In considering this appeal we cannot ignore the fact that appellant’s brief fails in many respects to comply with rule 21 of the rules of the Supreme and Appellate Courts of this state. A good faith effort to comply with said rule and a substantial compliance therewith must appear before a case will be determined upon its merits, and this has been so often and consistently held that no citation of authority…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Garn v. Board of Election CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Hinds, TrusteeIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fort Wayne Mercantile Accident Ass'n v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Moriarity v. HickamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Dorsey v. American Central Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Meyers, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Berning v. ScheumanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. National Life & Accident Insurance v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API