Legal Opinion

Berning v. Scheuman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1942No. 16,689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBedwell, P. J.

This was an action to determine the extent of the interest of the defendants in, and to partition certain real estate located in Adams County, Indiana.

There was a trial by the court which made a general finding and rendered a judgment thereon, from which two of the defendants, Amanda Berning and Charles Berning, seek to appeal. The only error assigned by them in this court is assigned as follows:

“1. The Court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial.”

The brief of such appellants filed in this court relies upon and discusses only one error as a reason for reversal, and that is,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Branson v. BransonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Fluck, Jr. v. DahlbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Smith v. First Natl. Bk. of Hartford City, Exr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. H. W. Johns-Manville Co. v. South Shore Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Income Guaranty Co. v. ZienlinskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hambey v. HillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Keplinger v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API