Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. Salt Lake City
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARFF, Judge:
This is an appeal by Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Company (Company) from a declaratory judgment granted in favor of Salt Lake City (City) interpreting two agreements. The trial court found the City responsible for maintenance of the “mains,” and the Company responsible for maintenance of the individual service lines and private lines from main to meter.
On January 2, 1920, the Company and the City entered into an agreement to exchange culinary and irrigation water and to provide for a pipeline system to distribute the culinary water. The agreement purported, among other…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Proyecfin De Venezuela, S.A. v. Banco Industrial De Venezuela, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Kintner v. HarrMontana Supreme Court · 1965
- Bullfrog Marina, Inc. v. LentzUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Jones v. HinkleUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Larrabee v. Royal Dairy Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Regional Sales Agency, Inc. v. ReichertCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Brown's Shoe Fit Co. v. OlchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- Saunders v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Jarman v. Reagan Outdoor Advertising Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- B. Investment LC v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.