Legal Opinion

Oldham v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 25, 1910PublishedCited by 15 opinions

CASE 96.-PROSECUTION AGAINST W. D. OLDHAM FOR CUTTING ANOTHER IN SUDDEN HEAT AND PASSION.- Appeal from Madison Circuit Court. J. M. BENTON, Circuit Judge. Defendant convicted and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

— Affirming.

The appellant, W. D. Oldham, was indicted in the Madison circuit court for the malicious cutting and wounding'of Boyd Wagers with intent to kill him. The trial resulted in a verdict finding him guilty of cutting and wounding in sudden heat and passion and fixed his punishment at a fine of $500. Judgment was duly entered upon the verdict and a new trial refused appellant.

*791Three grounds are presented for a reversal of the judgment: (1) That the verdict is not supported by the evidence and was the result of passion or prejudice on the part of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Housman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Gordon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Parrish v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. People v. CrosserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Cavanaugh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Renaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. McElwain v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API