Legal Opinion
Monon Corp. v. Stoughton Trailers, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 19, 1996No. 95 C 511PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GUZMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending is Defendant Stoughton Trailers, Inc.’s (“Stoughton”) motion to compel discovery of Plaintiff Monon Corporation’s (“Mo-non”) alleged attorney-client and work product information and documents. Specifically, Stoughton seeks to discover all of Monon’s documents and information that bear a sufficient relationship to the issue of Monon’s alleged inequitable conduct resulting from Monon’s non-disclosure of an on-sale bar and a prior art patent. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is hereby granted.
*101 BACKGROUND FACTS
O…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Labounty Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission, Dudley Shearing MacHine Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vardon Golf Co. v. Karsten Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Shanghai Meihao Electric, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009