Slusher v. Oeder
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHendrickson, P.J.
I concur with the majority’s disposition of the first and second assignments of error, but I must dissent from their disposition of the third assignment because I am not convinced that the Supreme Court has “implicitly resurrected” civil actions for alienation of affection by recognizing actions for negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Before the advent of R.C. 2305.29, which abolished civil actions for alienation of affection, a cause of action for alienation of affections existed if the aggrieved spouse could prove that defendant “wrongfully, maliciously and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haskins v. BiasOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Booth v. KrouseOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
- Lewis v. BauerOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
- Smith v. LyonOhio Court of Appeals · 1918