Legal Opinion

Spokane County v. Arvin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1932No. 23834. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

Spokane county brought this action to recover from H. W. Arvin, as guardian of the estate of Thomas McHarg, an incompetent person, for food, lodging, medical care and other necessities furnished the ward. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the claim should he sustained. Judgment was entered directing the guardian to pay the claim which had been presented to him out of the estate of the ward in the sum of $840. From this judgment, the guardian appeals.

There is no dispute in the facts, and they may be stated as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Directors of the Poor & of the House of Employment of Montgomery Co. v. NyceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Moss v. MossWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bremer County v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. McNairy County v. McCoinTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Jones County v. NortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. County of Los Angeles v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Conaway v. Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Lucido v. RippetoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API