Legal Opinion
Moore v. State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 2, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner contends that respondent New York City Transit Authority terminated him from his position as a railroad clerk *508despite his voluntary treatment and counseling, at respondent’s request, for alcoholism and that this action constituted an unlawful discriminatory practice. In view of the insufficient proof presented by respondent and its failure to refute petitioner’s allegations, as well as the paucity of any record in connection with the instant matter, it is evident that the State Division of Human Rights made an inadequate inquiry into petitioner’s charges. There is also no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bachman v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Goldsmith v. New York Psychoanalytic InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. Gaylord Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Matter of Steinberg-Fisher v. North Shore Towers Apts., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Flinker v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Ditaranto v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- State Division of Human Rights v. YMCAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.