Legal Opinion

Looschen v. Muehlfeld & Haynes Piano Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from trial term, Mew York county. Action by Jared J. Looschen against the Muehlfeld & Haynes Piano Company. Judgment by default was rendered for plaintiff, and execution thereon issued. From an order requiring the sheriff to deliver to the receiver appointed for said corporation the goods levied upon under such execution, and vacating a prior order requiring the sheriff to sell said goods, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRumsey, J.

On the 4th day of June, 1896, Jared J. Loosehen, the appellant here, caused to be issued out of the city court a two-days summons against the defendant, the Muehlfeld & Haynes Piano Company, to recover a certain debt due to him from said company. The summons was served. The defendant made default, and on the 9th of June judgment was entered by Loosehen against the defendant, for something over $1,800. The judgment was docketed on that day, and on the same day an execution was issued, and received by the sheriff of the county of New York. Afterwards, and during the life of the execution, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Varnum v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. French v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. In re Trustees of Schuyler's Steam Tow Boat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Milbank v. De RiesthalNew York Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of PondNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Boothe v. SpellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Empire Tube & Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API