Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v. Gale

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1928No. 20897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The ultimate question in this case is frankly stated in the brief of counsel for defendants in error, as follows:

“If at this time' the court should definitely rule that these property owners are not entitled to compensation in the event that the Railway Company does actually invade Eastgate and violate these valuable restrictive covenants, these property owners will be compelled to invoke the protection of the Constitution of the United States and the Supreme Court of the United States.”

In view of the fact that this paramount question must be ultimately determined in this…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Town of Bloomfield v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Smith v. Clifton Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  3. Kessler v. Lower Merion Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Wells v. City of DunbarWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Eggert v. PuleoOhio Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API