San Francisco National Bank v. Dodge
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH ' CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The appellant bank sued, to restrain the enforcement of state, county, and city taxes, levied for the. year 1900, upon shares of stock.of the bank. Adequate averments were made-to show equitable jurisdiction. Cummings v. National Bank, 101 U. S. 153, 157; Hills v. Exchange Bank, 105 U. S. 319; Lander v. Mercantile Bank, 186 U. S. 458. The taxes were alleged to be in conflict with the law of the United States. Rev. Stat. §5219.
The case was submitted upon the pleadings and an agreed-statement of facts. A decree ■ of dismissal was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hills v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Davenport Bank v. Davenport Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Rogan v. Commrs. of Calvert CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- A. F. Gilmore Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.