Legal Opinion

Bader v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 5, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"The plaintiff, a business visitor, recovered a verdict in an action tried before the court without a jury. The injuries complained of were sustained as the result of a fall in defendant's store due to slipping on a spinach leaf or pea pod. Several witnesses testified, over objection, that on prior and subsequent occasions they had observed vegetable matter, such as spinach, grape skins, beans and lettuce upon the floor. When a sidewalk in front of a store was habitually littered with vegetable refuse and the street cleaning department had protested to the owner, a nonsuit in an action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schnatterer v. BambergerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Alcott v. Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Kalb v. FisherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  4. Rom v. HuberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. TrusellSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. Lander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  4. Christine v. Mutual Grocery Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  5. Penny v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API