O'Donnell v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal hy plaintiffs from an order denying their motion for a new trial. -
This action was brought hy the next of Mn and heirs at law of Honora Sharp, deceased, for the purpose of obtaining a decree of the superior court .that certain bequests made by said Honora Sharp, deceased, in her last will and testament, are held by respondents in trust for appellants.
The action as brought involved a bequest of $200,000 to Adolph B. Spreekels and Reuben H. Lloyd, a bequest of $25,000 to the King’s Daughters’ Home for Incurables, and one of $25,000 to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Matter of Will of O'HaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Fairchild v. . Edson Edson v. . BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Clippinger v. BreartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- MacFarlane v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Estate of HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- O'Neil v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.