Legal Opinion
State v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 31, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2294PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
This special action challenges two orders of the respondent court: (1) an order that the prosecutor assigned to represent the State in a pending criminal case withdraw as attorney for the State, and (2) a later order refusing to reinstate the prosecutor. At the conclusion of oral argument, we assumed jurisdiction and granted relief, directing the respondent court to reinstate the attorney originally assigned to represent the State and indicated that this opinion would follow.
Real party in interest, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was arrested at his home in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chessman v. TeetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- The People v. GendronIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Loren R. Gajewski and Mervin A. Gajewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Frank v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- State v. TuzonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. LindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- People v. Superior Court (Hollenbeck)California Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.